Validated metrics we present on the talents’ cards are essentially designed to use flexibly by combining and making your own decision pipeline. One of the approaches might be as following to differentiate technically “good” talents: you could start reviewing project details talents contributed for – specially these fields: how popular is the project (indicator: “team size” metric), how big is the project (indicator: “project size” metrics – specially “main branch commits”), how much does the given project fit to your industry or problem area (indicator: “topics” and indicator: “tech stack”). Then you could check “contribution summary” (main branch) and “contribution volume” (main branch) metrics of talents in “My verified achievement” section. The rule of thumb is, if a talent has achieved more than 0.1% contribution volume on a large (L) or xlarge (XL) project – this could be considered as a strong indication for technically very good talents. In medium (M) size projects we see that strong talents have higher contribution volume about 1%+. Depending on your business requirements and expectation from talents you could also use metrics under the “My impressive works” section. If the terms we used here are strange, no worries we have provided a glossary for them.